Institutional Investors and the Canadian Student Housing Market: What Landlords Need to Know in 2026

Few segments of Canadian real estate have attracted as much institutional attention in recent years as student housing. Even as the federal government moves to cap international student admissions, global investment firms continue to allocate hundreds of millions of dollars to purpose‑built student accommodation across British Columbia, Quebec, and Ontario.

This confidence may appear counterintuitive at first glance. Headlines about declining study permits and immigration controls suggest weakening demand. Yet the data, the capital flows, and the lived reality near major campuses all point to the same conclusion: the Canadian Student Housing Market remains structurally undersupplied.

For landlords, developers, and property managers, this imbalance creates both opportunity and risk. Understanding why institutional investors remain bullish is essential for anyone operating in or adjacent to this sector.

The Structural Supply‑Demand Imbalance

At the heart of the Canadian Student Housing Market is a simple arithmetic problem. The number of students seeking accommodation continues to far exceed the number of purpose‑built beds available. While mature markets in the United States and the United Kingdom typically offer availability ratios between 30 and 40 percent, Canada’s ratio remains closer to 15 percent.

This shortfall is not cyclical. It is structural. For decades, Canadian universities expanded enrollment without a commensurate expansion of on‑campus or near‑campus housing. Private rental stock absorbed the overflow, often at the expense of the broader multifamily market.

Jonathan Turnbull of Harrison Street summarized this imbalance succinctly when noting that the number of demanded beds remains “outstanding and substantial,” while available supply continues to lag.

Why Institutional Capital Is Flowing In

Institutional investors are not sentimental buyers. Their entry into the Canadian Student Housing Market reflects a long‑term thesis built on three pillars: durable demand, predictable leasing cycles, and defensive income characteristics.

Harrison Street’s deployment of more than $500 million across 4,500 beds illustrates this strategy. Brookfield’s participation in student‑focused funds, and BGO’s recent entry into purpose‑built student rentals, further confirm that this is not speculative capital. It is strategic allocation.

These firms are not betting on short‑term rent spikes. They are betting on persistent undersupply, stable occupancy, and the institutionalization of a sector that historically relied on fragmented private ownership.

The International Student Cap: Signal or Noise?

The federal government’s decision to cap international students initially triggered concern across the rental sector. Study permit holders fell from over one million to approximately 725,000 within twenty months, raising fears of a demand shock.

In practice, the impact has been more nuanced. As Turnbull has noted, the policy primarily targeted non‑accredited institutions and language schools, rather than major universities. In Ontario, twenty‑two of twenty‑three universities maintained their visa allotments year over year.

This distinction matters. Purpose‑built student housing is typically anchored to accredited universities with stable domestic and international pipelines. As a result, demand near flagship campuses has proven far more resilient than in smaller, private‑college‑driven markets.

The Canadian Student Housing Market, in other words, is not monolithic. It is segmented by institution quality, location, and asset type.

Enrollment Trends and the Domestic Offset

Statistics Canada reports that university enrollment increased by 5.8 percent year over year to 2.3 million students in the 2023–2024 academic year. While international growth slowed, domestic enrollment rose sharply, particularly among first‑year applicants in Ontario.

This domestic offset is critical. In markets where international enrollment softened, domestic demand filled much of the gap. Near major institutions such as the University of Toronto, McGill University, and the University of British Columbia, leasing velocity has already begun to normalize.

For investors, this reinforces a key point: the Canadian Student Housing Market is driven by total enrollment, not solely by international flows.

Diverging Outcomes in Large and Small Markets

While major cities are stabilizing, smaller university towns have experienced more pronounced volatility. Privately owned student rentals in secondary markets were often acquired at peak prices following the pandemic, with optimistic rent projections and minimal downside modeling.

Nick Morrison of Flinnco Property Management has observed rent declines of roughly ten percent across multiple sectors, not just student housing. Rising mortgage rates, mandatory renovations, and softening rents have placed pressure on highly leveraged private landlords.

This divergence highlights an important institutional advantage. Large investors focus on top‑tier campuses, transit‑oriented sites, and professionally managed assets. Smaller, fragmented landlords are more exposed to policy shifts and cyclical volatility.

What This Means for Property Managers

As the Canadian Student Housing Market institutionalizes, property management becomes a central value driver. Student assets are operationally intensive. Turnover is high, maintenance cycles are compressed, and compliance requirements are strict.

Professional management systems now separate top‑quartile assets from underperformers. Preventative maintenance, standardized unit turns, and disciplined leasing processes are no longer optional.

This operational reality mirrors trends we observe across multiplex and multi‑unit housing more broadly. Scale, systems, and specialization increasingly determine long‑term performance.

Parallels with the Broader Multifamily Market

Student housing does not exist in isolation. For years, students absorbed a disproportionate share of conventional rental stock, contributing to low vacancy and rising rents in urban markets.

As purpose‑built supply expands, pressure on the broader multifamily sector may ease marginally. However, Canada’s overall housing shortage ensures that competition for rental units will remain intense.

From a portfolio perspective, student housing increasingly functions as a specialized subset of multifamily rather than a niche category.

Calls to Action: Positioning for the Next Cycle

For investors and landlords, the lesson is clear. The Canadian Student Housing Market rewards disciplined underwriting, institutional management, and long‑term capital.

Learn how professional management protects multi‑unit assets at https://www.avshospitality.ca

Explore our full property management platform at https://www.avshospitality.ca/property-management

Request a confidential portfolio review to assess how institutional‑grade management can improve asset performance.

Conclusion: A Sector Built on Structural Demand

Despite policy headlines and short‑term volatility, the fundamentals of the Canadian Student Housing Market remain intact. Enrollment growth, chronic undersupply, and institutional capital continue to reinforce one another.

For property owners, developers, and managers, the opportunity lies not in speculation, but in execution. As the sector matures, disciplined management will increasingly determine which assets thrive and which underperform.

Get in Touch